Hydrogen Ambassadors International
Competition
Online Vote has completed:
All Hydrogen Ambassador Teams have won!
 |
Meet
Our Winners!
Congratulations to the winning teams of the
2006 Hydrogen Ambassadors Competition
fully sponsored by Arno A. Evers and the
FAIR-PR Team! |
Team USA II:
Production of hydrogen and electricity in methane SOFC
Booth Number:
H81/5
 |
Scott Barnett (51)
Manoj Pillai (34)
Ilwon Kim (37)
Northwestern University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Functional Coating Technology, LLC, Evanston, IL, USA
|
|
|
|

Scott Barnett |

Manoj Pillai |

Ilwon Kim |

Functional Coating Technology (FCT) team is proud with the conversion rate of methane to hydrogen from Segmented-in-series SOFC modules. Due to the high value of electricity co-generated, the approach using electrochemical partial oxidation has a potential of producing hydrogen from natural gas cheaper than any other available method.
|
Methane reforming is typically used to produce syngas (H2+CO),
an important feedstock for the production of various chemicals
including methanol and liquid hydrocarbons. Syngas can also
be converted to H2, another important industrial feedstock
and a potential fuel. This paper describes a method, electrochemical
partial oxidation, where syngas and electricity are co-produced
in a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) that operates with methane
as the fuel. Due to the high value of the electricity produced,
this approach has the potential to produce hydrogen/syngas
more cost effectively than other methods.
In methane electrochemical partial oxidation (EPOx), a SOFC
is operated with the natural gas (i.e. methane) flow rate
and total stack current adjusted such that there are ? 1 oxygen
ions (O2-) pumped across the cell per methane molecule, the
stoichiometry of partial oxidation:
CH4 + O2- = CO + 2H2 + 2e-. (1)
Under appropriate conditions, the SOFC produces both syngas
(H2+CO) and electricity. This is quite different from conventional
fuel cells, where the fuel is almost fully oxidized. For the
case of a direct-methane SOFC, for example, the methane feed
rate would be 3-4 times lower, such that the reaction is closer
to complete oxidation:
(1/4)CH4 + O2- = (1/4)CO2 + (1/2)H2O + 2e-. (2)
Comparison of reactions 1 and 2 shows that for a given sized
SOFC, the same amount of electricity (2e-) is produced, but
the products are different.
EPOx provides two key advantages. First, the SOFC provides
pure oxygen such that there is no dilution of the syngas by
nitrogen, different than partial oxidation with air. Second,
the co-production of electricity and syngas improves the economics
of both syngas production and fuel cell electricity production.
In particular, when SOFC costs drop below ?$400 per kilowatt,
they are expected to become commercially viable. For an EPOx
SOFC, this means that there is no additional cost for the
production of syngas/hydrogen, other than the cost of the
additional feedstock natural gas. Thus, EPOx can produce syngas/hydrogen
at a lower cost than any other technology. This is critical
for alternative fuels such as hydrogen and gas-to-liquids
fuels (where natural gas is converted via syngas to clean
synthetic liquid fuels) to reach a competitive cost level.
The implementation of EPOx has been limited because direct
methane operation often leads to fouling of the anodes with
deposited carbon. Thus, non-standard SOFC materials, e.g.
Pt for the anode, have been used in order to avoid coking,
but are too expensive for practical devices. To date, SOFC
power densities and syngas production rates were relatively
low, and coking was often observed. In this paper, we demonstrate
stable methane EPOx operation of SOFCs without coking, yielding
both high electrical power densities and high syngas production
rates. We also present results of thermodynamic calculations
that provide estimates of expected EPOx operating conditions
and productivity. Taken together, these results demonstrate
the feasibility of EPOx SOFCs. |